Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Frontiers in public health ; 10, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1989245

ABSTRACT

Background The incubation period of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is estimated to vary by demographic factors and the COVID-19 epidemic periods. Objective This study examined the incubation period of the wild type of SARS-CoV-2 infections by the different age groups, gender, and epidemic periods in South Korea. Methods We collected COVID-19 patient data from the Korean public health authorities and estimated the incubation period by fitting three different distributions, including log-normal, gamma, and Weibull distributions, after stratification by gender and age groups. To identify any temporal impact on the incubation period, we divided the study period into two different epidemic periods (Period-1: 19 January−19 April 2020 and Period-2: 20 April−16 October 2020), and assessed for any differences. Results We identified the log-normal as the best-fit model. The estimated median incubation period was 4.6 (95% CI: 3.9–4.9) days, and the 95th percentile was 11.7 (95% CI: 10.2–12.2) days. We found that the incubation period did not differ significantly between males and females (p = 0.42), age groups (p = 0.60), and the two different epidemic periods (p = 0.77). Conclusions The incubation period of wild type of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020, in South Korea, does not likely differ by age group, gender and epidemic period.

2.
Viruses ; 14(5)2022 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1869811

ABSTRACT

Many countries have implemented public health and social measures (PHSMs) to control the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although the PHSMs are targeted at SARS-CoV-2 transmission control, they directly or indirectly impact the epidemiology of different respiratory viral diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the collateral impact of PHSMs used during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the epidemiology of other respiratory viruses, including influenza, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, and adenovirus infections. We conducted a systematic review of the published literature on changes in the incidence of respiratory viral diseases and detection rates of the respiratory viruses during COVID-19 pandemic, lasting from 2020-2021, published between December 2019 and March 2022 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We identified an overall decrease of 23-94% in the incidence of respiratory viral diseases and a decrease of 0-98% in the detection of the viruses. Our study suggests that the PHSMs implemented during COVID-19 pandemic reduced the incidence of respiratory viral diseases and transmission of respiratory viruses. At the time of this study, and as governments relax PHSMs, public health authorities should prepare for a probable increase in the burden of respiratory viral diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Public Health , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Infect Dis ; 225(5): 793-799, 2022 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1550555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was the predominant variant worldwide at the time of this study. However, its transmission dynamics were unclear. METHODS: We analyzed 405 local cases infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 and temporal patterns of viral shedding identified between 22 June and 31 July 2021 in Daejeon, South Korea. RESULTS: Overall, 20% were presymptomatic at the time of epidemiological investigation. We identified 6 clustered outbreaks, and all were associated with indoor facilities. In 23 household contacts, the secondary attack rate was 63%. We estimated the mean serial interval as 3.26 days (95% credible interval, 2.92-3.60), and 15% (95% confidence interval, 13%-18%) of cases seeded 80% of all local transmission. Analysis of the nasopharyngeal swab samples identified virus shedding from the presymptomatic cases and the highest viral load was observed 2 days after symptom onset. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the Delta variant is highly transmissible in indoor settings and households. Rapid contact tracing, isolation of the asymptomatic contacts, strict adherence to public health measures, and increased uptake of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, including booster doses, are needed to reduce community transmission of the Delta variant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Communicable Disease Control/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Virus Shedding
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(22)2021 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1523966

ABSTRACT

Vaccination against COVID-19 is an important strategy for its control. Assessing the willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine in different subgroups is important for an inclusive vaccination program design. Our aim was to determine the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate and associated factors among foreigners in South Korea. An online cross-sectional study was carried out from May to June 2021. In this study, 710 individuals participated and most were aged between 26 and 29 (36.1%) years. Overall, 70.8% were willing to receive the vaccine. Males were less likely to accept the vaccine than females (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4-0.7, p < 0.001). Single people were more likely to receive the vaccine than those who were married (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 0.9-2.0, p = 0.04). Other factors associated with willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine were; vaccine convenience (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3, p = 0.002), doctors' recommendation (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 2.0-3.9, p < 0.001), vaccine price (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.3, p = 0.003), vaccine effectiveness (OR: 8.3; 95% CI: 5.8-12.1, p < 0.001), vaccine importance (OR: 7.9; 95% CI: 4.6-14.1, p < 0.001), and vaccine safety (OR: 6.9; 95% CI: 4.5-10.8, p < 0.001). Providing more information on vaccine safety and effectiveness is required to increase vaccine acceptance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emigrants and Immigrants , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Republic of Korea , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL